Will Lockn' Actually Happen?? (POLL)

while I can't verify the statistic, it is certainly true that unlike with other diseases, there is a huge number of infected, and therefore infectious, asymptomatic people. They will unknowingly spread the virus to others, also unknowingly--in other epidemics, the sick stayed home, isolated,  and the well stayed away from them. This may not create a large danger for the young and healthy--who are ignoring the safety measures anyway--but puts all those with compromised health (including those simply from age) at high risk of infection with serious consequences. So the question stands, as it has from day one--is it acceptable to put those people at risk by not restricting behavior?

When this started, I gave the general public 2 months to attempt safety measures and then they'd be tired of it and simply blow it off. Here we are. The reopenings--with which I agree--has many people, even those otherwise careful, being very careless or completely ignoring protocol.  The demonstrations are another form of high risk--no, certainty--of mass  and rapid spread, that will, in my opinion, accompany a general population spike. 

At least the health care system can handle a spike now. The compromised infected individuals, not so much.